Point of View in Bartleby, the Scrivener Essay -- Herman Melville

Point of View is incorporated in to stories to show the readers how the chronicle is told. It includes describing the smudge and person in the fib. Position is how far the write upteller is from everything that is going on in the story. Person is way the narrator shows the character and their attitude. There are four-spot different parts that make up the Point of View. These four parts include Third-Person Omniscient, Third Person Limited Omniscient, First Person, and the Objective. Third-Person Omniscient is when the author of the story, tells the story as a narrator. They know , speak, and are able to follow every character in the story. Third-Person Limited Omniscient means that the narrator only knows the thoughts and feelings of cardinal character in the story. The author is still the narrator. First Person is when the author chooses one character to tell the story. You will often see the words, I, and me, through out. The narrator will most likely be in the middle of the action, or telling the story from a past perspective. Lastly, the objective is how the author gets the point crosswise without interpreting the characters feelings. According to our textbook, E-Fictions, it is similar to looking at a story as if the audience were watching it through a photographic camera lens. Herman Melville uses a first person point of view to show the narrators first hand fascination with his employee Bartleby, as well as Bartlebys strange behavior and insubordination. The lawyer hires Bartleby as his scrivener. He is awestruck because Bartleby is so quick and efficient. He asks Bartleby to help him examine papers and Bartleby replies, I would prefer non to. Bartlebys reply surprised the lawyer. The lawyer repeated himself. ... ... these letters speed to death. Ah, Bartleby Ah, humanityUsing first person point of view in this story was a good way to show the readers first hand how the lawyer felt. I dont think the author could have used whatever other poi nt of view to explain to the reader how the lawyer felt about Bartleby. If he had used third-person omniscient, it would have pulled away from the narrator, and focused on every(prenominal) of the characters more. If he would have used third-person limited omniscient, we would not have gotten how the other characters in the story felt about Bartleby. Objective would not have worked either, because he wouldnt really get to see what was going on in the lawyers head.In conclusion, point of view is very pertinent to telling the story. It is how the story is told, and who the story is told by. All of these factors go in to point of view.