Vancouver-Hollywood North vs the Loss of Canadian Identity Essay Example for Free

Vancouver-Hollywood northeast vs the Loss of Canadian Identity EssayIntroduction1 Vancouver is being c exclusivelyed North Hollywood because a vast of flash producers decide to set up their shooting places at BC, Canada. Vancouver is deserved to be rewarded as this special title because its unique spectator of the diverse sceneries and the sophisticated takeing technologies. These inputs have already traceed by Hollywood and lead the U.S. occupy fabrication entry into making the huge quantity of shoo-in yield era. The 2001 Report reason out that the 1998 Canadian issue incentive programs were very successful in attracting turnout from the U. S.A(StephenM.Katz, 2006, p.1). question has been brought into the public attention and this paper testament mainly focus on wherefore does Canada not encourage their own domestic film industry, but would rather give foreign film industry tax incentives.Additionally, due to the growing moment of Ameri crumb movies crushed into th e Canadian delight market, this paper will also discuss both the positive and negative effects emerged under this issue. The tax incentive tending(p) by the Canadian government cannot be denied for bingle of the reason to turn BC as puff up known asNorth Hollywood Foreign production companies will see the Production Services task extension jump to 25%, with an unchanged 6% bonus for work done outside the Vancouver atomic number 18a.(BC Announce 35% Film Incentive Credit, 2008). Actually, not only BC is doing such things but also New Zealand.Newman illustrates The film and television production industry is significant in both New Zealand and British Columbia. Governments in both localities provide substantial support for the industry through government agencies and taxincentives.(Newman.D,2005,abstract).Currently, BC is directly toward into a service-oriented country by providing the U.S. big financial profits. This strategy seems to give out a authenticly effective advan cement to enlarge their awareness toward the global without promoting their own film industry but rather borrowing their beauty to U.S.Takaki and Shoot explains that whatever of the U.S. Film associations like SAG (Screen Actors Guide) and FTAC (Television Actions Committee) already had an unpleasant attitude toward the Canadian provinceal governments tax incentive legislation (Takaki,MillieShoot, FilmTelevision,2001). They are not encourage the U.S. film industry to do the hoyden productions in order to persist the U.S. rights and promoting their own movie domestically. Currently, there are a lot of such top-grossing movies includeX men, Silent Hill, Mean girls,etc(Chris Hamilton, 2008) . Apparently, there are both advantages and disadvantages behind the runaway production for both U.S. and Canada.Take the barter issue as instancethe loss of the job opportunities would be one of the serious c at one clippingrn towards the Americas because the film producer would prefer to hir e the local employers rather than bring the workers all the way to B.C. This is aiming of saving appropriation expenditure. Many people like Pendarkur M hold the belief of creating employment is more important than fighting for better wages and working conditions(Pendarkur, 1998). Basically, this idea is fairly straight advancing which stand for its way much better tohave a job rather than getting a better wages and working conditions provided by their boss.In this way, the employment is seen as the priority of one country. Nevertheless, we palliate cannot deny the advantages and disadvantages it brought to BC and U.S. The optimistic effects might probably cause a decrease pink-slipped rate for the Canadians. In another words, more Canadians would find a job under the help of the U.S. film industry.On the other hand, there would be a high unemployed rate for the Americans. Other than the job opportunities we get, Vancouver is successfully known as North Hollywood currently and it helps to promote Canadians film industry. subsequently that, it widen the opportunities for the TV producer to do the movies and help toexpose the beauty of diverse BC sceneries to the whole universe. Eventually, he finish up with the solution that This type of thinking has resulted from the weakened position of Canadian and inter subject field unions, which has placed them in a struggle for survival and left them unprepared to negotiate with the coercive and expanding entertainment industry(Pendarkur, 1998). After getting the great job opportunities, BC is actually facing a further serious difficulty which is the lack of capability to get rid of the domination of U.S. and build their own entertainment industry. The longer hitch people adopted into something, the harder for them to leave it behind and build a new industry.Actually, there is a off the beaten track(predicate) long period when the U.S. Corporation first started dominated some of the Canadian entertainment market . According to Pendarur M4 Paramount Famous-Lasky, the leading vertically integrated firm in the United States, dominated the Canadian feature film market through its subsidiary, Fomous Players Canadian Corporation,(Pendakur, M. 1990). The Canadians were influenced and dominated by the U.S. Industry for such a long period already. This situation lead the Canadian get more adopted to U.S. Entertainment world rather than building up their own film industry. This lead to the consideration of the loss of local audiences once the government decide to promote their local film market. Moreover, audience fragmentation is another concerns about why Canadian not encourage making its own movies.If people randomly walk into a cinema, it is evidently to find out the U.S. movies took over a great percentage of movie products on the Canadian cinema.Also, it gets a fairly good feedback among the audiences which makes the Canadian cinema become prosperous. In order to let it delay the kindred sit uation and let it survive, the Canadian film industry realize to spend more time and attract more foreign powerful film-making countries is significant rather than creating their own domestic film. Through David Skinners research., he claimed thatthese definitions are all based on a concern that the dominant corporate media do not adequately represent the interests of all members of society(David, 2010, p.221). These definitions on the above quote are actually stand for the idea of option media . The dominant corporate media cannot be fully satisfied by one hundred percent of the audiences because divers(prenominal) people from the various social status have their own interests.To bemore specific, even though the Canadian government invest expenditure to promote the real Canadian movie,the audience fragmentation passive exists. To consider this issue in a further financial perspectives, it better and easier to support the U.S. runaway productions in order to keep the Canadian cin ema industry alive and have a large number of audiences really buy the tickets. Moreover, a more serious situation would happen derived from the previous sequences. The dominant corporate might only provide the pastime for those of them who have the ability to access media. Nevertheless, the rest of them might remain the same living style as what they were before because they dont have the capability to access them like some remote areas. The new technologys exist give people a new sight to understand the world.The powerful invention of these new media going to influence how we think and how we behave. After that, it causes the huge gaps between the one who can get into the cinema and who are not capable to use that. Its hard for a whole nation to unite together and figure out what their real interests are. The Canadian government provide the tax incentives doubtless created benefits for both of them financially but seems ignore the further concern of creating a real Canada consis ts of its real identity operator. What kind of movie we watch has a direct impact to shape Canadian itself. Specifically, someone who makes the film affect what kind of messages they get. It impacts the Canadian identity in several various aspects. Particularly, there is notdoubt that Canada and U.S. overlap a lot of similarities like the languages. However, there is one significant factor cannot be denied on this context which is the unique identity.The Canadians do have its own unique identity including the enthusiasm to the national hockey, the still existing of First Nations unsophisticated lifestyle and other factors make Canada become a unique nation and really help the Canadians to define who they are. Along with the tendency of growing relation U.S. film start to shootmovies in Canada, the Canada seems have less time to promote their own film. round of the U.S. identities are being shown during the films and this is going to directly injected into Canadians mind. Conseque ntly, they would not be able to have a sinewy nationality traits.In conclusion, this paper mainly explored the reasons for the Canadian government intentionally turn Vancouver into north Hollywood kind of of investing the film producer to shoot the real domestic movie with real local identity in it. Also, this paper looked at the profits and drawbacks from both U.S. film associations perspective and Canadian governments point of view. Next, it emphasis the significant role of one countrys entertainment industry.The film industry has no longer simplly provide an entertainment way for people to have a pastime but it become a nations symbol and reflected the countrys real identity. The elements being made during the scenes potentially injected into audiences mind and they behave toward the invisible messages being created by the film. As time passes, it definitelygoing to influence how Canadian behave and how they communicate between each other. This paper concluded that the creatio n of one countrys identity is far more significant compared with governments financial concern.ReferencesDavid, Skinner. (2010) Minding the Growing Gaps alternative media in Canada In Leslie R.S(ed.) Mediascapes. Nelson College Indigenous Press. Famous Movies Filmed in Canada Cinemaroll. (n.d.). Cinemaroll film making, from the viewers perspective. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http//cinemaroll.com/cinemarolling/famous-movies-filmed-in-canada/ Newman, D. (2005). Regions And Runways Film assistant In New Zealand British Columbia, 1990-2005. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture Policy, (117), 11-30. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.Pendakur, M. M., Sussman, G. G., Lent, J. A. (1998). Hollywood north filmand TV production in Canada. In , Global Productions Labor in the Making of the Information Society (pp. 213-238). Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Pendakur, M. (1990). Canadian Dreams American Control The Political Economy of the Canadian Film Industry. Retrieved from EBSCOhost .9Stephen M. K. (2006). The Global Success of Production Tax Incentives and the Migration of Feature Film Production From The U.S. to the World Year 2005 Production ReportAdobe Digital Editions version. Takaki, MillieShoot,( 12/14/2001). repugn Heats Up Over Runaway Tariff Proposal. Film Television Literature Index with Full school text (Vol. 42, Issue 50) Vancouver Film. Net BC Announces 35% Film Incentive Credit. (n.d.). Vancouver Film. Net. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http//www.vancouverfilm.net/2008/01/bc-plans-35-film-tax-credit.html